Okin argues that the intercourse system violates both liberty and you can equivalence from opportunity values just like the by efficiently delegating jobs in order to people predicated on sex it circumvents citizens’ “free collection of community” (Okin 1989: 103)
Rawls contends one activities at the rear of a great veil regarding ignorance perform prefer one or two prices: a freedom concept taking to the “most detailed overall program out of equivalent first liberties appropriate for an excellent equivalent program away from independence for everyone” and you can an idea of equivalence requiring equivalence out-of possibility and you will permitting inequalities from inside the wide range and money as long as they are to the advantageous asset of the least well-off (Rawls 1971: 302–303).
To the Okin’s glance at, because of this for the a sole people “sex you will no longer setting a legitimate a portion of the personal design, if in to the otherwise outside of the nearest and dearest” (1989: 103). However, Okin argues that applies to the family too. Intercourse blindness need certainly to play the same part throughout the nearest and dearest you to definitely it plays during these associations. From inside the Okin’s conditions, there should be “congruence” within prices that regulate such associations and people who govern family members lifetime (1989: 21). That’s, family must be only.
Okin now offers a moment argument to help with the claim that family should be only. Rawls demonstrates to you you to a people satisfying their two beliefs regarding justice shall be secure while the in it residents build a feeling of fairness (Rawls 1971: 453ff).